The Carpenter family settled their case against the HSE over the circumstances of their son’s birth which left him with cerebral palsy this week. Their lawyer, Roger Murray, when invited to comment on the legal process said that mediation has to be the way forward in cases such as these.
This is a seismic shift in mindset from an era when many litigators’ perception of themselves was as the gladiators of the legal world. They regarded mediation as the unmanly touchy-feely option not suited to the bear-pit of proper litigation. How things change as mediation moves firmly front and centre into the mind of the litigator, when deciding how to run a case best suited to the client and their circumstances.
Mediation agreement
Before the mediation itself begins the parties would be expected to sign up to an agreement to mediate. A copy of the agreement to mediate is generally given to each party after the mediator has had an opportunity to speak with them separately in advance of the mediation proper and explain the process.
What should the agreement to mediate contain?
The agreement to mediate should be written in clear, transparent language so that it is clear to non- legal parties what the process is, what happens in the event of agreement (the legally binding or non-binding nature of the agreement) and; what happens in the event there is no agreement. It needs to say something about:
- The confidentiality and the Without Prejudice status of the mediation
- The conduct of the mediation – who will attend/time/date/location. What documents should be given to the mediator etc.
- The apportionment of the cost of the mediation
- An acknowledgement that no terms will be legally binding until set out in writing and signed by the parties
- The role of the mediator during the mediation and following the mediation
- What happens at the conclusion of the mediation